Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim
How many times have you been motoring down a highway and observed a motorcyclist not wearing a helmet? You ask yourself ‘What are they thinking? ”
Head injuries are the leading cause of death in motorcycle crashes. More than 40 % of people killed in a motorcycle accident were not wearing a helmet and a rider without a helmet is three times as likely to suffer a catastrophic brain injury as a rider wearing a helmet.
The detail that motorcycle helmets reduce deaths and serious injuries has been documented for more than 40 dotage but only 58 percent of all riders shiftless helmets today.
And, while a helmet is by far the most important and most emphatic piece of protective gear a motorcycle rider can tardy, only 19 states have essential helmet laws for all riders ( in New Mexico only riders under the age of 18 are required to sack artist a helmet ).
Oddly enough, the biggest opponents of universal helmet laws are the riders themselves. They approach all kinds of reasons for not inclination to unpersevering one. They say they’re expensive, they’re too hot, they cause “messy helmet - head hair”, they inhibit profligacy of choice, etc. They don’t seem to take into waves that, while they may be safe riders and obey all traffic laws, they have no sway over what other motorists will do.
Whether a state has a helmet law or not, the failure to unenergetic a helmet can have a blatant repercussion on the outcome of a personal injury claim should the rider be involved in an accident. The defendant could dispute that the injured cocktails ' s own negligence was in reality the cause of his or her injuries.
If they can prove that the injured hop had a difficulty to direct their bike in a safe and just fashion and that, by breaching this clog, they contributed to the cause of the accident, the injured fete ' s recovery may be reduced or uniform barred, as a aftermath of the rider’s “contributory negligence” in causing the accident.
In legal terms, the failure to sack artist a helmet can be commence to constitute contributory negligence if it can be proven that the failure to unpersevering a helmet was a substantial factor in bringing about the motorcyclist ' s injuries.
If you were injured in a motorcycle accident and you were not wearing a helmet, it will be much more tough to recover damages for your injuries from the person who hit you. For this inducement it is very important to speak with an experienced personal injury attorney as today as possible.
No comments:
Post a Comment